<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: TV time!</title> <atom:link href="http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/</link> <description>Everything Nevada politics</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Steve Sebelius</title><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link> <dc:creator>Steve Sebelius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://slashpolitics.lvcitylife.com/?p=500#comment-220</guid> <description>Edward:Do we have the same definition of &quot;intellectually honest&quot;? I don&#039;t think so. The point of the show is to discuss the news of the week, not individual candidates. Reid gets attention because he makes news. And that&#039;s an intellectually honest reply.P.S. The station is owned by the Clark County School District, but makes its money in a variety of non-commercial ways, including underwriters and support of viewers like you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward:</p><p>Do we have the same definition of &#8220;intellectually honest&#8221;? I don&#8217;t think so. The point of the show is to discuss the news of the week, not individual candidates. Reid gets attention because he makes news. And that&#8217;s an intellectually honest reply.</p><p>P.S. The station is owned by the Clark County School District, but makes its money in a variety of non-commercial ways, including underwriters and support of viewers like you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EdwardHamiltonForUSSenate.com</title><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link> <dc:creator>EdwardHamiltonForUSSenate.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:16:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://slashpolitics.lvcitylife.com/?p=500#comment-219</guid> <description>hey steve ~
why is it that pbs&#039; tv channel 10 nevada week in review program is so bias, with its unbridled liberal view ? it is a taxpayer funded station but not always intellectually honest . . .like, despite my numerous entreaties to moderator mitch fox, you guys never mentioning my name as a bona fide democratic senatorial challenger to senator harry reid in the upcoming june 08, 2010 nevada democratic primary election</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey steve ~<br /> why is it that pbs&#8217; tv channel 10 nevada week in review program is so bias, with its unbridled liberal view ? it is a taxpayer funded station but not always intellectually honest . . .like, despite my numerous entreaties to moderator mitch fox, you guys never mentioning my name as a bona fide democratic senatorial challenger to senator harry reid in the upcoming june 08, 2010 nevada democratic primary election</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EdwardHamiltonForUSSenate.com</title><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link> <dc:creator>EdwardHamiltonForUSSenate.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://slashpolitics.lvcitylife.com/?p=500#comment-218</guid> <description>hey steve ~
why is it that pbs&#039; tv channel 10 nevada week in review program is so bias, with its unbridled liberal view ? it is a taxpayer funded station but not always intellectully honest . . .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey steve ~<br /> why is it that pbs&#8217; tv channel 10 nevada week in review program is so bias, with its unbridled liberal view ? it is a taxpayer funded station but not always intellectully honest . . .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Sebelius</title><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link> <dc:creator>Steve Sebelius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://slashpolitics.lvcitylife.com/?p=500#comment-217</guid> <description>Dave404:Yes, it&#039;s true Catherine Cortez Masto did not re-file the indictment because the statute had run. However, her other option was to appeal the dismissal, which was at that time her only recourse. She did not do that, although she asserted that her case was solid. My point was that if this was, indeed, a political attack, why would she not have continued the appeal? She made a tactical legal call, which happens all the time in law. But she could easily have gone the other way on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave404:</p><p>Yes, it&#8217;s true Catherine Cortez Masto did not re-file the indictment because the statute had run. However, her other option was to appeal the dismissal, which was at that time her only recourse. She did not do that, although she asserted that her case was solid. My point was that if this was, indeed, a political attack, why would she not have continued the appeal? She made a tactical legal call, which happens all the time in law. But she could easily have gone the other way on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dave404</title><link>http://slashpolitics.reviewjournal.com/2010/02/tv-time-2/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link> <dc:creator>dave404</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:49:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://slashpolitics.lvcitylife.com/?p=500#comment-216</guid> <description>Steve,Caught the show, but you left me wondering...I thought I read that the AG did not refile the indictment against Krolicki et.al. because the statute of limitations had run its course.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p><p>Caught the show, but you left me wondering&#8230;I thought I read that the AG did not refile the indictment against Krolicki et.al. because the statute of limitations had run its course.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
